JUST A THOUGH: ID4

I was watching the movie Independence Day today and something occurred to me: President Thomas J. Whitmore (played by Bill Pullman) had to be a Republican. His party was not mentioned in the movie, and although it was probably written by a bunch of libs, they inadvertently made him a conservative. Here's why...


Exhibit A: He is tough against a ruthless enemy willing to kill anyone and everyone that does not fit their sick twisted ideology. He was willing to use the full force of the United States Military against this enemy and he even used surveillance to monitor their every move. The enemy did not frighten him and he was steadfast in his efforts to defeat them. He did not compromise his morals to due pressure for his constituents to become and linguine-spined puss.

Exhibit B: Jasmine Dunbrow, played by Vivica A. Fox, was a black, female (single-mother), stripper. She said jokingly to the first lady that she "voted for the other guy" in the previous election. Now, who overwhelmingly gets the black vote, as well as the single mother vote? Democrats do. They also get the stripper vote but that's another story. There is no way she voted for President Whitmore.

Exhibit C: He wanted to stop illegal aliens from crossing the border.

Exhibit D: Look at this speech he gives before the climax of the movie. I can see Reagan, Bush, and any of the top Republican Presidential candidates (especially Rudy) saying this. I could never see Hillary, Edwards, Obama, or any other Democrat candidate saying it. It really is quite a good speech. Inspiring, uplifting, installing a can-do attitude into his people, his nation, the world...

Good morning. In less than an hour, an aircraft from here will join others from around the world. And you will be launching the largest aerial battle in this history of mankind. Mankind -- that word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can't be consumed by our petty differences anymore. We will be united in our common interests. Perhaps its fate that today is the 4th of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom, not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution -- but from annihilation. We're fighting for our right to live, to exist. And should we win the day, the 4th of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice:

We will not go quietly into the night!
We will not vanish without a fight!
We're going to live on!
We're going to survive!

Today, we celebrate our Independence Day!

It really gives me chills. We are literally in the fight of our lives and it is the worlds fight, not just ours. This fight against radical Islam is not going away anytime soon. We need to buck up and be steadfast, optimistic, and know that the American spirit prevails every time we are united, under one flag, with liberty, against an enemy trying to take it away. We should be living everyday like it is Independence Day, realizing the greatness of this nation and realizing defending it is worth the fight.

SHOE IS ON THE RIGHT FOOT

In a previous post (July 20th) I wrote that "most 'debate' now consists of an obligatory cliché one liner followed by a character assassination." This is most true with liberals. The response you'll get is one that basically says you should shut up and you don't count if you dare question their ideas or intent. There won't be a substantive argument on the rebound. No, no, no, you will literally get an obligatory cliché one liner followed by a character assassination. Something to discredit you based purely on emotion and name-calling rather than picking apart the essence of the argument you bring up.

Comments about my previous post (August 3rd), I was told that I sounded uneducated. Ouch. How dare I question Obamas way-out-there foreign policy ideas. Why did I sound uneducated? Well, I don't know actually. Nothing of substance was brought up. My arguments weren't picked apart and Obamas weren't defended. I was then told to stop reading Newsday and O'Reilly talking points to form my own opinions.

First, the last thing Newsday has is a right leaning bias. Anyone with a half brain can look at their editorial page for a few months and see it is left leaning. Which is fine, their circulation is down the tubes anyway; another indicator it is left leaning (NYT, LAT, BG, etc all down as well). Secondly, O'Reilly has not discussed Obamas foreign policy "ideas." If he hasn't discussed it, how could I steal his ideas? Lastly, I don't need O'Reilly or Limbaugh or even Hannity to tell me that invading Pakistan and taking nukes off the table is a bad idea. It's common sense (or at least I thought so).

So the obligatory one liner: YOUR TAKING O'REILLY TALKING POINTS!!!

The character assassination: YOU SOUND UNEDUCATED!!!

With no proof to back it up. Good day.

Barry's Trifecta of Naivety

He is just too damn inexperienced to run this country. This trifecta of naive comments clearly shows it. Barack Obama first said he wants to meet with the leaders of Iran, North Korea, and Syria immediately after becoming President (Lord help us). I want someone to cite for me an example in the past where diplomacy has REALLY worked. Where negotiation and appeasing the enemy has led to peace and offset the possibility of war. You can’t find any!

Fire needs to fight fire, and America’s flame burns greater than any terrorists will ever. It’s like asking the question, “Name for me one thing the government runs that’s done right?” Well, other than the military (when the left doesn’t emasculate it), the answer is always nothing! Are we really supposed to sit at the table with Ahmadinejad and force him to believe the Holocaust happened or that threatening to blow Israel off the map really isn’t the peace loving rhetoric he claims to be articulating?

Obama then said he would consider invading Pakistan. For those of you out of the know, Pakistan and Musharraf lead government is a great ally to the US. This is a guy who has escaped five assassination attempts, has disarmed terror operations trying to destabilize the country, and keep the government on offense against terror. Pakistani officials responded to the Obama comments. "It's a very irresponsible statement, that's all I can say," Pakistan's Foreign Minister Khusheed Kasuri told AP Television News. "As the election campaign in America is heating up we would not like American candidates to fight their elections and contest elections at our expense." Amen brother.

Lastly, Barry Hussein would never consider using nuclear weapons, which is ridiculously irresponsible to openly tell the enemy in the middle of a war. Wait a second… he would consider using them. Hold on again. What’s that? Oh, he wouldn’t use them. Obama was responding to a question by the Associated Press about whether there was any circumstance where he would be prepared or willing to use nuclear weapons in Afghanistan and Pakistan to defeat terrorism and al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden. Make up your mind man! This is kind of a serious question and his hesitant and ambivalent stance on the issue is worth noting for all you people having Obamagasms.



On a personal note, I met radio talk show host Laura Ingraham today at WABC and it was pretty sweet. She is very nice, brilliant and, quite frankly, a babe...

TRAGEDY, HEROISM, AND THE BLAME GAME

I’m sure by now you have heard about the collapsed portion of the Interstate 35W bridge over the Mississippi River. Right off the back, my thoughts and prayers go to the families of those involved and larger community in Minneapolis. This truly is a tragedy that should not happen in America. "This is not a rescue operation any longer," said Chief Jim Clack of the Minneapolis Fire Department. "It's a recovery operation, which means we move slower and more deliberately." The death toll is currently at four, is expected to rise, and more than 30 people are currently missing.

This terrible event does highlight, however, the love and respect Americans have for not only other American’s, but also human life in general. On 9/11 our firefighters, police officers, medics, etc showed this by running into the Word Trade Center. Rather than saving themselves, they ran INTO the buildings to save others. The same occurred over the past few days in Minneapolis.

Emergency workers were there immediately to help the injured and indigent. They saved people from the collapsed bridge as well as people being carried down the mighty Mississippi. Americans helping Americans was fully highlighted. People helped each other get out of their cars, moved debris off of them, gave them food and water to hold them over. Students on a school bus helped each other kick out an emergency window as teachers and other motorists brought them to safety. “There was a great deal of goodness going on there,” said Jay Reeves, a Red Cross worker. “People were immediately starting to help the children off the bus, lowering them over the side of the bridge.”



…Lastly (and this needs to be pointed out), is the Bush Derangement syndrome rapidly occurring. Much like he blew up the WTC, the levies in New Orleans, is responsible for global warming, terrorism, and dog bites, Bush is to blame for this terrible event happening. NPR low-ratings man Ed Shultz said “...the only reason Bush is talking about fatalities is because he didn’t give MN enough money to maintain the bridge.” Naturally, local politicians, city officials, and road inspectors play no role. Or forget about the fact that Congress appropriates the money. Its just Bush!!! Pathetic. And Democrats want to end the 'politics of personal destruction?’ Yea right. They invented it! Check out more of the Democrats taking no more than a few hours to politicize this here. Absolutely pathetic.

FINE...RUIN THE MOMENT

The UK Daily Mail has posted an article with the most detailed pictures of earth ever seen. They really are spectacular. Of course, leave it to some liberals to ruin the moment with comments about the article. I'm not taking issue with their right to say what they want, however I am taking a look at the bigger liberal picture of how miserable and guilty these people feel:

"From a distance" you can't see the rubbish, hatred, inequality and sheer stupidity that mar this beautiful globe.- Mike Randall, Worcester, England

This is typical liberalism; gloom and doom, people suck, animals are pristine, humans ruin the planet, global warming, socialism would rid the earth of inequality. These people see the bad in everything. They are literally miserable and will do anything they can to spread that misery. That's liberalism (socialism). There's doom unless of course it is some lib program where good intentions are met, not taking a look at the unintended consequences of their 'good intentions.' Their good intentions make themselves feel better and utopia has been fulfilled. And here is another one:

Something so beautiful and we are destroying it! Sad, very sad, we don't deserve to lease the planet!- Jeff Rudd, Drogheda, Ireland.

Ohh noo. WHAAAAA!!! I feel soooo guilty. You should too. Thats what they'll say at least. Global warming and all the pollution (America's fault of course) is going to kill us. We have 10 years left to live (says AL Gore). Manhattan is going to be underwater! Oh, Please!!!

The earth is beautiful. Savor the momet. Enjoy it. Take a gander at God's great creation. Be happy. There's nothing wrong with it!

MIND POLICE

This article refers to a 23-year-old man who was arrested Friday on hate-crime charges after he threw a Quran in a toilet at Pace University on two separate occasions, police said.

Now, as objectionable as throwing someone’s Koran in a toilet may be…IT IS NOT A CRIME. This person did not punch someone or shoot someone or harass someone and THEN throw the Koran in the toilet. It’s called free speech, and it looks like this person did nothing wrong. We can however burn the American flag in the name of free speech and that’s protected of course. Liberals always scream separation of church and state yet anything that might get some Muslims mad is somehow exempt from that rule. Like how it is not allowed to pray in public schools but if you want to put a footbath for Muslims at a taxpayer funded college, well that’s cool.

What is a “hate crime” anyway? It’s the thought police, it’s a silence of free speech, and it’s using the word ‘hate’ have people think twice before they say what they want to. Dare I say sometimes hate is justified? I hate people who rape children. I hate murders. I hate how the Democrats are trying to secure defeat in Iraq. That’s warranted and protected, isn’t it? Yes, or course it is. Unless you talk against a Muslim. Again, they are exempt from the rules.

Oh, and why is it not a “hate crime” when anything Catholic is defaced? Remember the cross in the jar of urine. Or how about the “painting” of Mary defaced with dung? Oh, that’s right, it’s in the name of art! Silly me, art is great free expression and cannot be condemned because of the gray area art encompasses. Dare you criticize that, well, you just don’t get the complexity of the message the artist is sending. We are awaiting what CAIR thinks about this; somehow I don’t think they’ll take the side of free speech...

QUEEN BEE BEAUTIFUL

Queen Bee Pelosi is the 4th most beautiful person on Capitol Hill according to thehill.com.

Name: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (Calif.)
Age: 67Hometown: Baltimore, Md.
Political Party: DemocratD
ating Status: Married to Paul Pelosi

It is rather uncomfortable calling the 67-year-old House Speaker HouseNancy
Pelosi (D-Calif.), mother of five and grandmother of six, “hot.” So we let
others decide. There is a Facebook.com group called “I can’t say why, but I
kinda think Nancy Pelosi is cute.” There’s another group there, too, but its
name is too crass to print.Moreover, Pelosi has become a fashion icon in
colorful Armani skirt-suits.Robin Givhan, the Washington Post fashion critic,
earlier this year wrote, “She looks polished and tasteful … dignified and
serious [and] she also happens to look quite good.” A copy of a Chinese Sea
Pearl ring that Pelosi has been wearing sells on eBay. Opening bid: 88 cents.No
question that wealth, posh homes and a loving family have helped smooth the
rough edges of life.Nevertheless, it is puzzling just how the first female
Speaker of the House stays so fit. She is always working and traveling, rarely
exercises and reportedly noshes on Ghirardelli mint chocolates. Maybe Pelosi was
right when she told The New York Times, “Ice cream for breakfast is a good
thing.”

I’ll tell, I didn’t know she is 67. I guess for her age she looks good. This will probably make Hilary jealous though and Bill might have a new prospect. We’ll see!